Live Demos

Try the tools.

Most consultants tell you they build tooling. These run in your browser right now. Both are clean-room, generic demos — the client versions go deeper, on your vehicle data and your safety case.

Motion studies

Not tools — figures. Animated engineering drawings of the mechanisms the tools reason about: fault injection, containment, timing, classification. Each opens as its own sheet; the drawing-sheet figures also live inside the insights they illustrate.

Motion study
Engineering the Safe State
An automatic emergency braking sequence running on live kinematics: nominal driving, obstacle tracking, warning, braking, safe state — the whole fault-reaction chain as one continuous scene.
Open study (new tab) →
Motion study
Motion Studies — Vol. 1: Living Diagrams
The site's drawing language, set in motion: a monitored signal chain under fault injection, a fault-handling trace against the FTTI, and the safety state machine. Flat 2D, zero dependencies, light and dark.
Open study (new tab) →
Motion study
Motion Studies — Vol. 2: Mechanisms at Work
Five safety-mechanism archetypes, animated: 2oo3 majority voting that keeps running, the E-Gas three-level concept, a boot-time self-test that gates release, a sin/cos plausibility check on the unit circle, and why a window watchdog beats a timeout.
Open study (new tab) →
Motion study
Fault Propagation Studies
Three E/E systems drawn as open enclosures. A fault is injected, propagates along the signal chain, and is contained — by time (window watchdog), by structure (1oo2 lockstep), or by information (E2E-protected comms).
Open study (new tab) →
Drawing sheet
FTTI Verification
A fault-injection capture as an animated drawing sheet: fault, detection, reaction, safe state — 168 ms against a 250 ms FTTI. Also embedded in the FTTI insight it illustrates.
Open study (new tab) →
Drawing sheet
Fault Tree — Minimal Cut Sets
A fault tree run live: a single fault that fails to reach the top event, a dual-point fault that does, minimal cut sets, and the quantification against a 10 FIT ASIL D target.
Open study (new tab) →
Drawing sheet
HARA — ASIL Determination & Decomposition
Severity, exposure, controllability resolved through the ISO 26262-3 table to ASIL D, then decomposed into two independent ASIL B(D) elements — with the DFA obligation that comes with it.
Open study (new tab) →
Beyond the demos

Need the real thing — requirement traceability, FMEDA automation, FTTI on your vehicle model? See Safety Tooling & Simulation, Built to Order.

Book an intro call